Categories
Television & Movies

The cult of Blake’s 7

The Cult of... Blake's 7If you’re familiar at all with my reviews of the region 2 DVDs of the BBC late ’70s/early ’80s sci-fi series Blake’s 7, you know that the bonus stuff on those is scattershot at best. Kevin Davies, the guy behind the brilliant More Than 30 Years In The TARDIS documentary aired in 1993 (as well as the documentary on the Hitchhiker’s Guide TV series DVDs), had a documentary ready to go for these DVDs, but it was nixed by the new rights-holders to the Blake’s 7 property, with rumors abounding that the Davies documentary reveled too much in the show’s legendary campiness for the tastes of the new owners of the copyright, who were wanting to retool it into a gritty, dark space opera. (In 5+ years, they’ve only managed to turn out some audio dramas, but that’s neither here nor there.) Davies’ work never saw the light of day, and the DVDs had odd assortments of extras that were probably of interest only to the diehards.

Little did I know that the BBC would later turn around and produce its own documentary that would’ve been perfect. I got my hands on a 2006 documentary called “The Cult of Blake’s 7”, which encapsulated the entire series, in half an hour, about as perfectly as anyone could, while interviewing most of the surviving key players you could possibly want to hear from (though Jan “Cally” Chappell was conspicuous by her absence). The show was irreverent, but never mocking – which is a very fine line to walk when you’re dealing with something that went to the excesses that Blake’s 7 sometimes went to. (The degree to which it’s become fashionable to make fun of B7 today really surprises me sometimes, so it’s admirable that the producers stayed this side of outright mockery.) Clips and snippets appear between the interviews, often hilariously appropriate to what’s being discussed. As the documentary was made for widescreen, it’s really startling to see how well many of the clips reframe in 16:9! The whole thing is narrated by Robert “Kryten” Llewellyn of Red Dwarf fame.

Anyway, it’s sad that this came along too late for inclusion on the final season’s DVD set, and even sadder that Kevin Davies’ project seems destined to languish in obscurity. (I’ve never quite worked up the sheer amount of gumption involved to e-mail him and say “Could I get a look at what you did have ready?” and I keep holding out hope that it might be released on its own someday, or just put on YouTube. I’d just like to see it. But in the meantime, this’ll do – I felt it did my favorite ’70s SF series justice.

I’ll be back soon to blog about More Things That Only I Care About. 😆… Read more

Categories
...And Little E Makes 3

Night of the Cuddlebugs

Evan vs. CuddlebugsThrough a total fluke of gift-giving from several folks, Evan has wound up with a surfeit of Cuddlebugs. They arrived in various forms – they can be strapped to his wrists, slipped onto his feet, hung over his head, held and played with (or just gnawed on) (or thrown in the general direction of nearby cats), and you can practically cover the kid in ’em.

And he kicks and wiggles like crazy. (Just like just about any sane kid covered in bugs would, really, if you think about it.) They drive him absolutely nuts. This is the sort of thing that helpfully gives otherwise well-adjusted children undefeatable lifelong phobias.

Aren’t they cute?

(Don’t ask me about the cow. He tried to stick the cow in his mouth last night. Obviously, unlike the cuddlebugs, he does not fear the cow.)… Read more

Categories
Serious Stuff

Super Duper Tuesday

Chauncey Gardener for PresidentSo, today being Super Duper Tuesday, I wobbled uphill to the fire station around the corner from my place, and, as a voter not registered to either party, cast a vote in the Democratic primary for Barack Obama. I’ll admit that I’ve spent much of the past year growing more and more disillusioned with the American political process and its attendant dialogue. When a national dialogue on something as vitally important as who will lead us descends to – and remains at – the level of professional wrestling smack talk, something somewhere is broken, and you can’t lay all the blame at the doorstep of something as nebulous as “the electoral college” or “campaign funding”. Something in the very basic fundamental language of how we, as a nation, approach politics, approach the idea of running for and serving in a public office, has gotten very, very broken. Sometimes I think the media plays more of a role in that dumbing-down of the informed electorate than I’m giving it credit for. I’ve been watching the media on a casual level over the past few months, from my relatively new standpoint of an observer rather than a participant, and I’ve noticed a tendency to go more for Jerry Springer-esque “oh no you di’n’t!” feuds – either creating them out of whole cloth or egging them on – than on substantive reporting on the candidates, their platforms, and so on.

With the volley of crap that’s gone on between Clinton and Obama, I will admit to having come within a hair’s breadth of voting in the Republican primary for McCain. But that would’ve been a gut reaction, more of a knee jerk than anything. I’ve been following Obama closely, and yeah, he’s thrown a few head-shakingly, “I wouldn’t have said that” stuff out into the ether here and there (though nothing quite as staggering as Mike “fry all of the state government’s computer systems before handing Arkansas over to a new governor and then deny all knowledge” Huckabee’s assertion that he’s going to, oh, eliminate the only source of income that the federal government has, namely the IRS), but when Obama can get his feet planted on the Earth again, I find that his ideas of where the country should go are more firmly in line with what I think should be done. And in that end, that, more than any label that any given candidate has, should really be the determining factor. However, behavior on the campaign trail can’t be discounted, and shouldn’t be: while a candidate’s platform, and their ability to defend attacks on it, should be the mind’s criteria for picking the right candidate, how they conduct themselves forms the emotional, gut-feeling side of that equation as well. It speaks to their character more than a list of promises of things they’ll try to push through Congress possibly can.

I wouldn’t vote for Hillary Clinton if you paid me to, at the primary level or further down the line. She simply doesn’t impress me. Keep in mind that she actually has, in my mind, a very close connection with Huckabee: she used to be in Arkansas. We know Hillary – and Mike – of old. No way. (And before anyone asks “But what if Obama runs as Hillary’s VP?”, I think I have a much better shot of becoming fabulously rich opening a series of franchised ice skating rinks in Hell than of actually seeing that ticket, or vice-versa, on a ballot.) I simply don’t trust her.

I’m sad that Wesley Clark didn’t even pitch his hat into the ring for this one, but I can see where his age might erode any chances of being taken seriously for a Presidency lasting into 2012. As for why McCain has caught my eye: I like McCain’s forthrightness, level-headedness, and ability to answer questions put to him with something bearing a much more close resemblance to straight talk than what anyone normally hears from Washington. I don’t line up with McCain on the issues as much as I do with Obama, but I trust McCain more than I trust Mrs. Clinton.

And if the Huckster actually lands the nomination and wins in November? I’ve always thought living in New Zealand would be lovely.

Anyway, thus ends a rare serious rambling from me. I don’t expect everyone – hell, I don’t expect anyone – to agree with me in an election year. (Remind me to tell you about the time I voted for Hagelin!) But I do hope you at least got out and voted today. I got out and voted today during a tornado watch, with the kiddo. What’s your excuse?… Read more

Categories
Critters

Fur family photos

So I noticed last night, while hanging out in Little E’s room, that there was a fortuitous planetary alignment…except with cats, not planets. Which is good, because I’m not sure how many planets I could comfortably fit on the bed.

Othello, Olivia and Oberon

I had to brighten that picture considerably, at the cost of some detail on Oberon. I tried taking other photos with all three there, but it didn’t quite work… … Read more

Categories
Television & Movies

Whose lines are they anyway?

Can I have one of these movies where I don't say NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!?I remember not so long ago, ’94ish or so, when J. Michael Stracynzski talking to Babylon 5 fans openly about the show was just an unheard-of thing. These days we have stuff like The Fuselage (where the writers and other creative forces behind Lost talk to the fans).

But there’s an L.A. Times interview with Russell T. Davies (of Doctor Who revival fame) in which he says this:

He also notes that he deliberately keeps organized fandom at arm’s length: “I think we’re an unusual science-fiction franchise in taking a very big step back from fandom and having nothing to do with them. . . . Every program on the BBC has a message board on the website. I forbid it to happen on ‘Doctor Who.’ I’m sorry to say this, all the science fiction producers making stuff in America, they are way too engaged with their fandom. They all need to step back.”

Which I thought was interesting. Now, that being said, I can see where RTD is a bit weary of fandom – there are people who are practically scholars in all things Who, while folks like Losties and B5 fans are just along for the ride and not pointing out contradictions in four decades of continuity across several media – but should the needle in general swing more toward JMS or RTD? Again using Lost as an example, look at the whole hubbub over Nikki and Paulo: the fan feedback literally did those two new characters in, when in fact those characters had been added to explore the story through the eyes of people who weren’t the omnipresent characters such as Jack, Locke, Kate, etc. – which was something else the fans had expressed an interest in. By trying to accede to the fans’ wishes, the makers of Lost arguably pissed away A-story time, or time that could’ve been spent fleshing out better known “minor” characters who’d been there all along – damned if you do, damned if you don’t. (I will say this about that, though – if they hadn’t tried to cram Nikki and Paulo into the story last season, we would’ve missed out on the wickedly funny episode Expose’, which disposed of them in a darkly comical way. That episode alone is almost enough reason to justify their rather limited existence.)

Who’s writing this stuff anyway – them or us? Discuss.… Read more