{"id":1478,"date":"2009-07-17T01:31:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-17T07:31:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thelogbook.com\/earl\/?p=1478"},"modified":"2009-07-17T01:31:00","modified_gmt":"2009-07-17T07:31:00","slug":"warning-to-the-idea","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thelogbook.com\/earl\/2009\/07\/17\/warning-to-the-idea\/","title":{"rendered":"I&#8217;m warning to the idea"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A couple of days ago, I mentioned <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thelogbook.com\/earl\/2009\/07\/15\/cut-the-wire\/\">my intention to ditch the TV side of my cable subscription and go to a seldom-mentioned internet-only tier of service<\/a>.  In that entry I mentioned that one of the few things that gave me pause about ditching cable TV (especially since I haven&#8217;t gotten a DTV converter box) was that I&#8217;d be losing the local channels for severe weather coverage.  Unless you&#8217;ve lived in tornado alley and have intimate knowledge of the kind of &#8220;combat readiness&#8221; that living here in the springtime entails, that may sound silly, but trust me&#8230;it&#8217;s a biggie around here.  I have a weather alert radio to fill that gap, but I was curious about the possibility of what they&#8217;d call &#8220;a software solution&#8221; in the business world.<\/p>\n<p>I did a little bit of research and found <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.interwarn.com\">Interwarn<\/a><\/strong>, a commercial software package that offers TV-style warning crawlers on your monitor, as well as graphical watch\/warning maps (sort of like the things that, anymore, take up about a quarter of the TV screen during bad weather).  It&#8217;s astoundingly customizable &#8211; you can decide what kind of warnings will trigger a crawler, and not every crawler will trigger an alert sound (which can be whatever kind of .wav file you feel like making it &#8211; the temptation&#8217;s definitely there to bust out the old Star Trek red alert sound&#8230;); the degree to which you can define the area involved is amazing too.  I live on the border of Arkansas and Oklahoma, and I can pick counties out of two states for the program to keep an eye on.  If I wanted to, I could have it watch out for my old stomping grounds in Brown County, Wisconsin too.  It takes up a startlingly small slice of CPU resources and bandwidth, <em>despite<\/em> checking in for new warnings about every 90 seconds.  (As with so many other things, you can slow that down so it&#8217;s only checking every 3 minutes or however often you like; honestly, in this part of the country, I left it at the check-as-often-as-you-can default.)  Quite by accident, I also discovered that it happily pops warning crawlers up on top of full-screen video &#8211; there you go, you can still get warnings while watching a movie or what have you.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s a shot of the live National Weather Service radar loop with Interwarn&#8217;s live watch\/warning map.  Who needs a TV station anyway?<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.thelogbook.com\/earl\/hizzouse\/q3-09\/badwxpc.jpg\" alt=\"Interwarn\" \/><\/p>\n<p><small>(Why am I watching Oklahoma&#8217;s watches and warnings?  Since we&#8217;re on the border, it&#8217;s a given that what barrels through Oklahoma will wind up in Arkansas; this is also why I used to watch KTUL during severe weather events and then turn to the local stations when the stuff actually arrived here.)<\/small><\/p>\n<p>The company behind Interwarn also has a software package called Stormlab, but it&#8217;s geared toward a higher-end market &#8211; real live meteorologists (or students thereof) and\/or storm chasers.  My inner weather geek is more than happy with Interwarn alone.<\/p>\n<p>The registration fee is $40, but since we&#8217;ll be saving that much on our cable bill within two months by dropping TV, I&#8217;m not even blinking at that figure.  While my cable TV&#8217;s still hooked up, however, this afternoon was stormy enough to provide a live-fire test.  I watched the local TV stations and I watched Interwarn running on a machine that, other than also keeping the live radar in a browser, wasn&#8217;t doing anything.  Interwarn was either neck-and-neck with the TV station warning crawlers&#8230;or, more often, it was <em>faster<\/em> than the TV stations.  (Fun fact: Interwarn isn&#8217;t worried about pissing off sponsors by running a crawler during a commercial.)<\/p>\n<p>The one problem is that whatever machine&#8217;s running Interwarn, in a severe weather situation, really needs to be a machine that you don&#8217;t mind leaving up and running in that sort of weather.  I recently &#8220;decommissioned&#8221; Orac and all but gutted it, but sometime between now and next spring, Orac may return as a bare-bones machine that, when push comes to shove, won&#8217;t be a great loss if it eats lightning, but until then will serve a fairly vital purpose, especially during storm season.<\/p>\n<p>Software solution found.  I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve ever gone from &#8220;let&#8217;s see what this shareware trial version does&#8221; to &#8220;oh <em>yeah<\/em>, baby, let me know where to send the money for the registered version!&#8221; in the course of an afternoon&#8230;but I&#8217;m <em>totally<\/em> sold on Interwarn.<\/p>\n<p><em>Links: <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.interwarn.com\">Interwarn<\/a><\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A couple of days ago, I mentioned my intention to ditch the TV side of my cable subscription and go to a seldom-mentioned internet-only tier of service. In that entry I mentioned that one of the few things that gave me pause about ditching cable TV (especially since I haven&#8217;t gotten a DTV converter box) was that I&#8217;d be losing the local channels for severe weather coverage. Unless you&#8217;ve lived in tornado alley and have intimate knowledge of the kind of &#8220;combat readiness&#8221; that living here in the springtime entails, that may sound silly, but trust me&#8230;it&#8217;s a biggie around [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[38,37,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1478","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-feedback","category-gadgetology","category-should-we-talk-about-the-weather"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thelogbook.com\/earl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1478","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thelogbook.com\/earl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thelogbook.com\/earl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thelogbook.com\/earl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thelogbook.com\/earl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1478"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.thelogbook.com\/earl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1478\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thelogbook.com\/earl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1478"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thelogbook.com\/earl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1478"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thelogbook.com\/earl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1478"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}