<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stepping in a slide zone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelogbook.com/earl/2006/09/23/stepping-in-a-slide-zone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelogbook.com/earl/2006/09/23/stepping-in-a-slide-zone/</link>
	<description>The not-quite-daily, not-entirely-incoherent ramblings of your little...green...friend, webmaster Earl Green.  If you read this blog, you'd better like some baby and cat pictures.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 21:43:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ubikuberalles</title>
		<link>http://www.thelogbook.com/earl/2006/09/23/stepping-in-a-slide-zone/comment-page-1/#comment-1104</link>
		<dc:creator>ubikuberalles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelogbook.com/earl/?p=441#comment-1104</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a bummer that your grandfather&#039;s photos appear to be lost. It&#039;s really cool to scan old pictures you haven&#039;t seen since you were a kid or never seen before.

I plan to borrow my parents pictures and negatives someday. My mom doesn&#039;t understand but I hope to convince her to part with them for the short time it takes me to scan them. They have a lot of old pictures and so it would be a major project (bigger than scanning all of my pictures). My first goal is to scan pictures of me and my siblings when we were young.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a bummer that your grandfather&#8217;s photos appear to be lost. It&#8217;s really cool to scan old pictures you haven&#8217;t seen since you were a kid or never seen before.</p>
<p>I plan to borrow my parents pictures and negatives someday. My mom doesn&#8217;t understand but I hope to convince her to part with them for the short time it takes me to scan them. They have a lot of old pictures and so it would be a major project (bigger than scanning all of my pictures). My first goal is to scan pictures of me and my siblings when we were young.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earl</title>
		<link>http://www.thelogbook.com/earl/2006/09/23/stepping-in-a-slide-zone/comment-page-1/#comment-1102</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelogbook.com/earl/?p=441#comment-1102</guid>
		<description>Actually, your mention of getting one some time back was what put the mental post-it note in the back of my brain to grab a film/neg scanner if I ever found an affordable one.

The one huge pang of regret is that my grandfather, who was an award-winning photographer, put together a huge number of slide shows of his work, and narrated them all, put cue tones on his cassettes and had it all keyed to work with the theater-style viewing gallery he built in the basement of his home.  I have no idea what happened to all of his work when he died about 11 years ago, and I wish that this technology had been around to preserve all of that work while he was alive.  He was a traditionalist, but he was intrigued enough the year that I brought my video camera with me that I think he might&#039;ve been tickled to have his stuff archived as JPGs, MP3s, and Flash slideshows.  That&#039;s the one regret that just kills me.  I could do that &lt;em&gt;now.&lt;/em&gt;

Anyway, now &lt;em&gt;I&#039;m&lt;/em&gt; babbling.  This is what happens when it&#039;s 5am.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, your mention of getting one some time back was what put the mental post-it note in the back of my brain to grab a film/neg scanner if I ever found an affordable one.</p>
<p>The one huge pang of regret is that my grandfather, who was an award-winning photographer, put together a huge number of slide shows of his work, and narrated them all, put cue tones on his cassettes and had it all keyed to work with the theater-style viewing gallery he built in the basement of his home.  I have no idea what happened to all of his work when he died about 11 years ago, and I wish that this technology had been around to preserve all of that work while he was alive.  He was a traditionalist, but he was intrigued enough the year that I brought my video camera with me that I think he might&#8217;ve been tickled to have his stuff archived as JPGs, MP3s, and Flash slideshows.  That&#8217;s the one regret that just kills me.  I could do that <em>now.</em></p>
<p>Anyway, now <em>I&#8217;m</em> babbling.  This is what happens when it&#8217;s 5am.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ubikuberalles</title>
		<link>http://www.thelogbook.com/earl/2006/09/23/stepping-in-a-slide-zone/comment-page-1/#comment-1101</link>
		<dc:creator>ubikuberalles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2006 08:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelogbook.com/earl/?p=441#comment-1101</guid>
		<description>Negative scanners are pretty cool. If you recall, I got mine about a year ago and it was fun scanning in my old negatives. When I first got the scanner I wanted to scan at the highest resolution (2400 bpi, I think). That took &lt;i&gt;forever&lt;/i&gt; and it didn&#039;t really improve the quality of the scan. That&#039;s partly because, at certain scan resolutions, the granular pattern of the film interferred with the rectangular pattern of the scanner. Makes a nice moire pattern but it doesn&#039;t make for a great picture. As a result, most of my scans are at 600 dpi.

Another problem I discovered is that I have to resize my scans if I want to incorporate them with  other pictures via photoshop. My digital camera generates pictures at 144 dpi and if I try to add a scanned picture to it via Photoshop, the scanned picture is HUGE!!!! I have to either resize the negative or change it to match the dpi of the other picture.

Oops. Sorry for the babblin&#039;. Enjoy your new scanner!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Negative scanners are pretty cool. If you recall, I got mine about a year ago and it was fun scanning in my old negatives. When I first got the scanner I wanted to scan at the highest resolution (2400 bpi, I think). That took <i>forever</i> and it didn&#8217;t really improve the quality of the scan. That&#8217;s partly because, at certain scan resolutions, the granular pattern of the film interferred with the rectangular pattern of the scanner. Makes a nice moire pattern but it doesn&#8217;t make for a great picture. As a result, most of my scans are at 600 dpi.</p>
<p>Another problem I discovered is that I have to resize my scans if I want to incorporate them with  other pictures via photoshop. My digital camera generates pictures at 144 dpi and if I try to add a scanned picture to it via Photoshop, the scanned picture is HUGE!!!! I have to either resize the negative or change it to match the dpi of the other picture.</p>
<p>Oops. Sorry for the babblin&#8217;. Enjoy your new scanner!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
